US v. Claude Bellamy
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:99-cr-00049-F-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998865075]. Mailed to: Bellamy. [12-6508]
Appeal: 12-6508
Doc: 11
Filed: 05/31/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6508
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLAUDE WENDELL BELLAMY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:99-cr-00049-F-1)
Submitted:
May 24, 2012
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
DAVIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
May 31, 2012
HAMILTON,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claude Wendell Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se.
John Samuel Bowler,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6508
Doc: 11
Filed: 05/31/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Claude
Wendell
Bellamy
appeals
the
district
court’s
order denying his motion for correction or modification of the
record.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
(E.D.N.C.
Mar.
United States v. Bellamy, No. 7:99-cr-00049-F-1
12,
2012).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?