US v. Claude Bellamy

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:99-cr-00049-F-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998865075]. Mailed to: Bellamy. [12-6508]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-6508 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/31/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6508 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLAUDE WENDELL BELLAMY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:99-cr-00049-F-1) Submitted: May 24, 2012 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. DAVIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and May 31, 2012 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Claude Wendell Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-6508 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/31/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Claude Wendell Bellamy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for correction or modification of the record. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (E.D.N.C. Mar. United States v. Bellamy, No. 7:99-cr-00049-F-1 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?