Carl Wiley v. Buncombe County

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00181-RJC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998883008]. Mailed to: Carl Wiley. [12-6513]

Appeal: 12-6513

Doc: 18

Filed: 06/26/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6513

CARL EDWARD WILEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BUNCOMBE COUNTY; VAN DUNCAN, Individually
capacities and Buncombe County Detention
HANSEN, Individually and official capacities,

and official
Facility; K.

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville.
Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cv-00181-RJC)

Submitted:

June 21, 2012

Decided:

June 26, 2012

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Edward Wiley, Appellant Pro Se.
Curtis William Euler,
BUNCOMBE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Asheville, North Carolina;
David John Adinolfi, II, Special Deputy Attorney General,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6513

Doc: 18

Filed: 06/26/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Carl Edward Wiley appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we deny Wiley’s motion for appointment of counsel
and his motion for application for appearance of counsel form,
bar admission, and ECF registration form, and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.

Wiley v. Buncombe Cnty.,

No. 1:10-cv-00181-RJC (W.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2012).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

the

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2