Tyrone Hurt v. United States Parole Comm

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998826963-2] Originating case number: 8:10-cv-02099-RWT,8:09-cv-01248-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998917229]. Mailed to: T. Hurt. [12-6554]

Appeal: 12-6554

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/16/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6554

TYRONE HURT,
Petitioner – Appellant,
and
WILLIAM G. TURNER,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMM.; U. S.
STATES OF AMERICA,

DEPT. OF JUSTICE; UNITED

Respondents.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Roger W. Titus, District Judge.
(8:10-cv-02099-RWT; 8:09-cv-01248-RWT)

Submitted:

July 25, 2012

Decided:

August 16, 2012

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6554

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/16/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Hurt seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing

him

from

this

action

seeking

the

removal

detainer lodged against another plaintiff, William Turner.
court

may

exercise

jurisdiction

only

over

final

of

a

This

orders,

28

U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

The

order Hurt seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Accordingly, we

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal
for

lack

of

jurisdiction.

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

2