Bradley Sheppard v. Warden of FCI Estill

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998841437-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cv-03220-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998907833]. Mailed to: Bradley Sheppard. [12-6603]

Appeal: 12-6603

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/02/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6603

BRADLEY SHANE SHEPPARD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN OF FCI ESTILL,
Respondent – Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-03220-RMG)

Submitted:

July 26, 2012

Decided:

August 2, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bradley Shane Sheppard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6603

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/02/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Bradley

Shane

Sheppard,

a

federal

prisoner,

appeals

the district court’s order construing his post-judgment motion
as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district
court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 &
Supp. 2012) petition.
reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

See Sheppard v. Warden of FCI Estill,

No. 1:10–cv–03220-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 19, 2012).

Further, we deny

Sheppard’s motion for the appointment of counsel.

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

the

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2