US v. Donovan Bradley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:04-cr-00076-MSD-FBS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998907819]. Mailed to: Donovan Robert Bradley. [12-6643]

Appeal: 12-6643

Doc: 11

Filed: 08/02/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6643

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DONOVAN ROBERT BRADLEY, a/k/a Donny,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (4:04-cr-00076-MSD-FBS-1)

Submitted:

July 26, 2012

Decided:

August 2, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donovan Robert Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard
Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6643

Doc: 11

Filed: 08/02/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

Robert

appeals

PER CURIAM:
Donovan

Bradley

the

district

court’s

order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a
sentence reduction.
§ 3582

motion

discretion.

for

We review an order granting or denying a
a

sentence

reduction

for

abuse

of

See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th

Cir. 2010) (citing United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478
(4th Cir. 2004)).

“A district court abuses its discretion if it

. . . bases its exercise of discretion on an erroneous factual
or legal premise.”

DIRECTV, Inc. v. Rawlins, 523 F.3d 318, 323

(4th Cir. 2008) (citing James v. Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 239 (4th
Cir.

1993)).

We

have

thoroughly

reviewed

the

record

and

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
reducing

Bradley’s

sentence.

district court’s order.

Accordingly,

we

affirm

the

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid in the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2