John Fishback v. State of Maryland

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998867338-3] Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00927-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998974370]. Mailed to: Fishback. [12-6666]

Appeal: 12-6666

Doc: 18

Filed: 11/05/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6666

JOHN WILLIAM FISHBACK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY;
MARYLAND COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS; CITY OF BALTIMORE; DANIEL
H. GINSBURG; BENNETT & BAIR; ARTHUR M. FRANK; FRANK M.
CONAWAY; LESLIE D. GRADET; GARI BAIR; EMANUEL BROWN; ALLEN
L. SCHWARTZ; TWILLA DRIGGINS; PATRICIA C. JESSEMY,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:12-cv-00927-JFM)

Submitted:

October 2, 2012

Decided:

November 5, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John William Fishback, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6666

Doc: 18

Filed: 11/05/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
John

William

Fishback

appeals

the

district

court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
find

no

reversible

error.

We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,

reasons stated by the district court.

for

appointment

of

counsel.

affirm

for

the

See Fishback v. Maryland,

No. 1:12-cv-00927-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 4, 2012).
motion

we

We

We deny Fishback’s
dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2