US v. Nathaniel Jone
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:06-cr-00044-REP-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998919363]. Mailed to: Nathaniel Jones. [12-6673]
Appeal: 12-6673
Doc: 7
Filed: 08/20/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6673
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NATHANIEL JONES, a/k/a Devon Najee Hinton,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of
Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:06-cr-00044-REP-1)
Submitted:
August 16, 2012
Decided:
August 20, 2012
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6673
Doc: 7
Filed: 08/20/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel
denying
his
motion
Jones
seeking
U.S.C. § 3582 (2006).
reversible
error,
a
the
district
reduction
of
court’s
sentence
order
under
18
We have reviewed the record and find no
given
reduction that he seeks.
the district court.
appeals
that
Jones
is
ineligible
for
the
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
United States v. Jones, No. 3:06-cr-00044-
REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?