Stuart Tompkins v. Sandra Thoma

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-ct-03049-D. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998937318]. Mailed to: Stuart Tompkins. [12-6723]

Appeal: 12-6723

Doc: 29

Filed: 09/13/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6723

STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUPERINTENDENT SANDRA THOMAS, Department of Correction;
KENNETH HUNT; COLBERT L. RESPASS; DAVID W. KEYS; J. HAYNES;
WILLIAM BASNIGHT, III; HATTIE B. PIMPONG; PAMELA J.
LOCKLEAR; ROSE LOCKLEAR; BILLIE J. WEAVER; JOHN DOE
LOCKLEAR; CLIFTON SUTTON; PAUL TAYLOR; JOHN DOE HUNT,
Assistant Superintendent; LYNN HENRY; JOHN DOE HUNT,
Sergeant; JOHN/JANE DOE, Transfer Coordinator; JANE DOE;
JOHN DOE, Captain; M. C. LOCKLEAR; JOHN DOE, Director
Classification Committee; GEORGE BOYSDEN; MARSHALL PIKE,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:11-ct-03049-D)

Submitted:

September 11, 2012

Decided:

September 13, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stuart Wayne Tompkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6723

Doc: 29

Filed: 09/13/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Stuart

Wayne

Tompkins

appeals

the

district

court’s

orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
and denying his motion for reconsideration.
the record and find no reversible error.
for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm

district

court.

Tompkins

v.

Thomas, No. 5:11-ct-03049-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2011 & Apr. 5,
2012).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2