US v. Anthony Chalk

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:04-cr-00657-JFA-6 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998974488]. Mailed to: Anthony Chalk. [12-6775]

Appeal: 12-6775

Doc: 13

Filed: 11/05/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6775

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY CHALK,
Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (0:04-cr-00657-JFA-6)

Submitted:

September 28, 2012

Decided:

November 5, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Chalk, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United
States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6775

Doc: 13

Filed: 11/05/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Anthony
denying

his

Chalk

motion

under

reduction of sentence.
reversible error.

appeals

U.S.C.

district

court’s

§ 3582(c)(2)

order

(2006)

for

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.
00657-JFA-6

18

the

(D.S.C.

Mar.

United States v. Chalk, No. 0:04-cr29,

2012).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2