Kendall Green v. Sgt. Anderson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [998864069-2]. Originating case number: 2:10-cv-03080-CMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998949093]. Mailed to: Kendall Green. [12-6802]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-6802 Doc: 18 Filed: 10/01/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6802 KENDALL GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SGT. D. ANDERSON, of Lee Correctional Institution; JON OZMINT, Director of SCDC; LT. RICHARDSON, SMU Security; MS. L. JOHNSON, Grievance Coordinator; MAJOR JAMES C. DEAN, Security Over Institution; WARDEN PADULA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (2:10-cv-03080-CMC) Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kendall Green, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, Appellees. II, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-6802 Doc: 18 Filed: 10/01/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kendall Green appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district Green v. Anderson, No. 2:10-cv-03080-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. court. 11, 2012). We deny government expense. facts and materials legal before Green’s motion for a transcript at We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?