Kendall Green v. Sgt. Anderson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [998864069-2]. Originating case number: 2:10-cv-03080-CMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998949093]. Mailed to: Kendall Green. [12-6802]
Appeal: 12-6802
Doc: 18
Filed: 10/01/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6802
KENDALL GREEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SGT. D. ANDERSON, of Lee Correctional Institution; JON
OZMINT, Director of SCDC; LT. RICHARDSON, SMU Security; MS.
L. JOHNSON, Grievance Coordinator; MAJOR JAMES C. DEAN,
Security Over Institution; WARDEN PADULA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (2:10-cv-03080-CMC)
Submitted:
September 27, 2012
Decided:
October 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kendall Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Edgar Lloyd Willcox,
WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina,
Appellees.
II,
for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6802
Doc: 18
Filed: 10/01/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kendall
Green
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
Green v. Anderson, No. 2:10-cv-03080-CMC (D.S.C. Apr.
court.
11,
2012).
We
deny
government expense.
facts
and
materials
legal
before
Green’s
motion
for
a
transcript
at
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
the
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?