Matthew O'Brien v. Mr. Summerfield

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-02346-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998920826]. Mailed to: Matthew Spencer O'Brien. [12-6812]

Appeal: 12-6812

Doc: 13

Filed: 08/21/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6812

MATTHEW SPENCER O’BRIEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MR. SUMMERFIELD,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
DR. BROOKS; BOBBY P. SHEARIN; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER; SCOTT S.
OAKLEY,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen Lipton Hollander, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-02346-ELH)

Submitted:

August 16, 2012

Decided:

August 21, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Spencer O’Brien, Appellant Pro Se.
Daniel Christopher
Costello, WHARTON, LEVIN, EHRMANTRAUT, KLEIN & NASH, Annapolis,
Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6812

Doc: 13

Filed: 08/21/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Matthew Spencer O’Brien appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

O’Brien v. Summerfield, No. 1:11-cv-02346-ELH (D. Md.

Feb. 21, 2012; Apr. 5, 2012).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2