US v. Christopher Mitchell
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:90-cr-00020-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998919509]. Mailed to: Christopher Mithcell. [12-6817]
Appeal: 12-6817
Doc: 11
Filed: 08/20/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6817
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, a/k/a Hassan Jones,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston.
John T. Copenhaver,
Jr., District Judge. (2:90-cr-00020-2)
Submitted:
August 9, 2012
Decided:
August 20, 2012
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.
John J. Frail, Steven
Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6817
Doc: 11
Filed: 08/20/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher
order
denying
his
18
sentence reduction.
reversible error.
Mitchell
U.S.C.
appeals
the
§ 3582(c)(2)
district
(2006)
court’s
motion
for
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
United States v. Mitchell, No. 2:90-cr-
00020-2 (S.D. W. Va. Apr. 18, 2012).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?