US v. Enoc Alcantara-Mendez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-hc-02178-BR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999015327]. Mailed to: Enoc Alcantara-Mendez. [12-6846]
Appeal: 12-6846
Doc: 29
Filed: 01/04/2013
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6846
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner – Appellee,
v.
ENOC ALCANTARA-MENDEZ,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:11-hc-02178-BR)
Submitted:
December 14, 2012
Decided:
January 4, 2013
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jennifer Haynes Rose, LAW OFFICE OF JENNIFER HAYNES ROSE,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Thomas G. Walker,
United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, David T. Huband,
Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6846
Doc: 29
Filed: 01/04/2013
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
After a hearing, the district court ordered that Enoc
Alcantara-Mendez be committed to the custody of the Attorney
General
pursuant
to
18
U.S.C.
§ 4246
(2006).
Counsel
for
Alcantara-Mendez filed a timely notice of appeal of the district
court’s
order.
Prior
to
that
notice
of
appeal,
however,
Alcantara-Mendez filed a separate pro se notice of appeal.
Alcantara-Mendez
in
that
appeal
challenged
both
the
As
district
court’s order denying reconsideration and the order committing
him
to
the
previously
custody
considered
both of those orders.
district
custody
court’s
of
the
Attorney
General,
Alcantara-Mendez’s
this
arguments
court
regarding
We, therefore, have already affirmed the
order
committing
Attorney
General.
Alcantara-Mendez,
20120
5193410
(unpublished).
Accordingly,
duplicative. *
the
of
WL
we
Alcantara-Mendez
See
(4th
United
Cir.
dismiss
Oct.
this
to
the
States
22,
v.
2012)
appeal
as
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
*
We note that counsel for Alcantara-Mendez raises
additional arguments to those raised in the prior appeal. Even
if we considered these additional arguments to be properly
before us we conclude that these arguments lack merit.
2
Appeal: 12-6846
Doc: 29
Filed: 01/04/2013
Pg: 3 of 3
before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?