US v. Mark Bufford, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:07-cr-00066-RAJ-JEB-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998950527]. Mailed to: M. Bufford. [12-6907]

Appeal: 12-6907

Doc: 8

Filed: 10/02/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6907

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MARK S. BUFFORD, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News.
Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:07-cr-00066-RAJ-JEB-1)

Submitted:

September 27, 2012

Decided:

October 2, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark S. Bufford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman,
Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6907

Doc: 8

Filed: 10/02/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Mark

S.

Bufford,

Jr.,

appeals

the

district

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

court’s
We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

United

States v. Bufford, No. 4:07-cr-00066-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. filed
Feb. 27

&

entered

Feb.

29,

2012).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2