US v. Vance Gibson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:93-cr-00211-TDS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998973226]. Mailed to: Vance Gibson. [12-6912]

Appeal: 12-6912

Doc: 8

Filed: 11/02/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6912

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VANCE MARCEL GIBSON, a/k/a Reginald Hilton Belton,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (6:93-cr-00211-TDS-1)

Submitted:

September 20, 2012

Decided:

November 2, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vance Marcel Gibson, Appellant Pro Se.
Sandra Jane Hairston,
Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United
States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6912

Doc: 8

Filed: 11/02/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Vance Marcel Gibson appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction
of

sentence

Guidelines
conclude

based

Manual

the

on

Amendment

(2011).

district

denying the motion.

We

court

750
have

did

to

the

reviewed

not

abuse

its

because

presented

discretion

and
in

See United States v. Gibson, No.

6:93-cr-00211-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. May 9, 2012).

adequately

record

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court.

argument

the

Sentencing

See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197,

200 (4th Cir. 2010).

oral

U.S.

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

We dispense with

legal
before

contentions
the

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2