Rex Hatfield v. Robert Garrison

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-cv-00498. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998950430]. Mailed to: Rex Hatfield and Everly Hatfield. [12-6913]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-6913 Doc: 23 Filed: 10/02/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6913 REX HATFIELD; EVERLY HATFIELD, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ROBERT L. GARRISON; RALPH MOORE; DAVY PIERSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00498) Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 2, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rex Hatfield, Everly Hatfield, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-6913 Doc: 23 Filed: 10/02/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Rex Hatfield and Everly Hatfield appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on their complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hatfield v. Garrison, No. 5:11-cv-00498 (S.D. W. Va. May 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?