Rex Hatfield v. Robert Garrison
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-cv-00498. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998950430]. Mailed to: Rex Hatfield and Everly Hatfield. [12-6913]
Appeal: 12-6913
Doc: 23
Filed: 10/02/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6913
REX HATFIELD; EVERLY HATFIELD,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
ROBERT L. GARRISON; RALPH MOORE; DAVY PIERSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley.
Irene C. Berger,
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00498)
Submitted:
September 27, 2012
Decided:
October 2, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rex Hatfield, Everly Hatfield, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6913
Doc: 23
Filed: 10/02/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Rex Hatfield and Everly Hatfield appeal the district
court’s
order
accepting
the
recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge and denying relief on their complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971).
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Hatfield v. Garrison, No. 5:11-cv-00498
(S.D. W. Va. May 4, 2012).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?