US v. David Zebrowski

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:96-cr-00041-JRS-3. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998920713]. Mailed to: David Zebrowski. [12-6922]

Appeal: 12-6922

Doc: 6

Filed: 08/21/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6922

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID ZEBROWSKI, a/k/a Dog, David Stewart,
Brady, a/k/a Mad Dog, a/k/a Eric Conrad Smith,

a/k/a

Lewis

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:96-cr-00041-JRS-3)

Submitted:

August 16, 2012

Decided:

August 21, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Zebrowski, Appellant Pro Se.
Richard
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond,
Appellee.

Daniel Cooke,
Virginia, for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6922

Doc: 6

Filed: 08/21/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
David

Zebrowski

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence
reduction and denying his motion for reconsideration.

We review

for abuse of discretion a district court’s decision on whether
to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) and review de novo a
court’s conclusion on the scope of its legal authority under
that provision.
Cir. 2010).

United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th

We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of

discretion by the district court.

Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v.

Zebrowski, No. 3:96-cr-00041-JRS-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2012; May
8, 2012).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2