US v. Enoc Alcantara-Mendez

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-hc-02178-BR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998964218]. Mailed to: Enoc Alcantara-Mendez. [12-6923]

Appeal: 12-6923

Doc: 11

Filed: 10/22/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6923

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner – Appellee,
v.
ENOC ALCANTARA-MENDEZ,
Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:11-hc-02178-BR)

Submitted:

September 28, 2012

Decided:

October 22, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Enoc Alcantara-Mendez, Appellant Pro Se.
David T.
BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Huband,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6923

Doc: 11

Filed: 10/22/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Enoc

Alcantara-Mendez

appeals

the

district

court’s

orders committing him to the custody of the Attorney General
under

18

U.S.C.

reconsideration.
that

the

§

4246

(2006)

and

denying

his

motions

for

Our review of the record leads us to conclude

district

court

did

not

err

in

finding

that

Alcantara-Mendez met the criteria for commitment and did not err
in denying his motions for reconsideration.
affirm

the

district

court’s

orders.

We

Accordingly, we

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2