US v. Shaunte Lassiter

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:07-cr-00060-RBS-TEM-3 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998920591]. Mailed to: Shaunte Lassiter. [12-6938]

Appeal: 12-6938

Doc: 5

Filed: 08/21/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6938

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SHAUNTE TORRANE LASSITER,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:07-cr-00060-RBS-TEM-3)

Submitted:

August 16, 2012

Decided:

August 21, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shaunte Torrane Lassiter, Appellant Pro Se.
Laura Marie
Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6938

Doc: 5

Filed: 08/21/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Shaunte Torrane Lassiter appeals the district court’s
orders

denying

his

18

U.S.C.

motion for reconsideration.

§

3582(c)(2)

(2006)

motion

and

We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error in the court’s denial of § 3582(c)(2)
relief.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

United States v. Lassiter, No. 2:07-cr-00060-

RBS-TEM-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 19, 2012).

Because the district court

lacked authority to reconsider its initial order, see United
States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), we
affirm the court’s denial of Lassiter’s motion to reconsider.
We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2