US v. Curtis Burston, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:04-cr-00371-F-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998920523]. Mailed to: Curtis Burston, Jr.. [12-6970]

Appeal: 12-6970

Doc: 7

Filed: 08/21/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6970

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CURTIS BURSTON, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:04-cr-00371-F-2)

Submitted:

August 16, 2012

Decided:

August 21, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Burston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Kimberly Ann Moore,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-6970

Doc: 7

Filed: 08/21/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

Burston,

appeals

PER CURIAM:
Curtis

Jr.,

district

court

orders

denying his motion for relief from his sentence and denying his
motion for reconsideration.
district

court’s

district court.

orders,

We have reviewed the record and the

and

affirm

on

the

reasoning

of

the

United States v. Burston, No. 5:04-cr-00371-F-2

(E.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2012; May 17, 2012).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2