US v. Sean Fowlke
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cr-00244-CCB-5 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998956878]. Mailed to: Sean Fowlkes. [12-6981]
Appeal: 12-6981
Doc: 10
Filed: 10/11/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SEAN DARNELL FOWLKES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:09-cr-00244-CCB-5)
Submitted:
September 25, 2012
Decided:
October 11, 2012
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sean Darnell Fowlkes, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Clayton Hanlon,
Assistant United States Attorney, Rod J. Rosenstein, United
States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-6981
Doc: 10
Filed: 10/11/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Sean
Darnell
Fowlkes
appeals
the
district
court’s
order denying his motions for reconsideration and to alter or
amend the denial of his request for grand jury materials.
have
reviewed
Accordingly,
the
we
record
affirm.
and
See
find
no
Pittsburgh
reversible
Plate
We
error.
Glass
Co.
v.
United States, 360 U.S. 395, 399-400 (1959); In re Grand Jury
Proceedings,
dispense
800
with
F.2d
oral
1293,
argument
1298-99
because
(4th
the
Cir.
facts
1986).
and
We
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?