Gregory Marshall v. Ronald Weber

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998911298-2]; denying Motion to consolidate case (Local Rule 12(b)) [998899487-2]; granting Motion leave to proceed plra [998876972-2], updating fee code Originating case number: 8:11-cv-02755-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998996810]. Mailed to: Gregory Marshall. [12-7001]

Appeal: 12-7001

Doc: 15

Filed: 12/06/2012

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7001

GREGORY MARSHALL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RONALD S. WEBER,
JOUBERT, Medical
Warden, WCI,

Mental Health Counselor, WCI; Dr. AVA
Director for WCI; J. PHILIP MORGAN,

Defendants – Appellees,
and
GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary for Division of Correction;
SCOTT OAKLEY, Inmate Grievance Office; JUDGE J. FREDERICK
MOTZ; JUDGE CATHERINE C. BLAKE,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Roger W. Titus, District Judge.
(8:11-cv-02755-RWT)

Submitted:

November 30, 2012

Decided:

December 6, 2012

Before KING, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy P. Tennis, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; H.

Appeal: 12-7001

Doc: 15

Filed: 12/06/2012

Pg: 2 of 3

Kenneth Armstrong, ARMSTRONG, DONAHUE, CEPPOS & VAUGHAN, CHTD,
Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 12-7001

Doc: 15

Filed: 12/06/2012

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Gregory
denying

his

Marshall

motion

for

appeals

a

the

preliminary

district

injunction.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we

affirm

for

the

reasons

stated

by

court’s

the

order

We

have

Accordingly,

district

court.

Marshall v. Weber, No. 8:11-cv-02755-RWT (D. Md. May 31, 2012).
We deny the motions to consolidate and to appoint counsel, grant
leave to proceed without prepayment of fees, and dispense with
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal

contentions

are

before

this

and

court

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3