US v. Llewellen Smith

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:96-cr-00066-REP-20 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998976766]. Mailed to: David J. Novak, Llewellen F. Smith, Brian Whisler. [12-7003]

Appeal: 12-7003

Doc: 12

Filed: 11/07/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LLEWELLEN FERNANDO SMITH, a/k/a Louie,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:96-cr-00066-REP-20)

Submitted:

November 2, 2012

Decided:

November 7, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Llewellen Fernando Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Stephen
Wiley Miller, Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Brian R. Hood, David John Novak, Brian L. Whisler, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; Andrew Gerald
McBride, WILEY REIN, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7003

Doc: 12

Filed: 11/07/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Llewellen Fernando Smith appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

United States v. Smith, No. 3:96-cr-00066-REP-20 (E.D.

Va. May 25, 2012).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

the

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2