US v. Anthony Olvi

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:95-cr-00038-RGD-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998976640]. Mailed to: Anthony L. Olvis. [12-7006]

Appeal: 12-7006

Doc: 7

Filed: 11/07/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY L. OLVIS, a/k/a Tony,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (4:95-cr-00038-RGD-1)

Submitted:

November 2, 2012

Decided:

November 7, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony L. Olvis, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Edward Bradenham,
II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7006

Doc: 7

Filed: 11/07/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Anthony L. Olvis appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his
sentence
Guidelines

pursuant

to

Manual

Amendment

(2011).

We

750
have

to

the

reviewed

U.S.
the

Sentencing
record

and

conclude that the district court properly determined that Olvis
was not eligible for a sentence reduction because Amendment 750
did not lower his Guidelines range.
reasserts

the

arguments

he

To the extent that Olvis

raised

in

the

district

court

regarding the calculation of the drug quantity attributable to
him, those arguments are foreclosed by Dillon v. United States,
130 S. Ct. 2683, 2693-94 (2010).

Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.

See United States v.

Olvis, No. 4:95–cr–00038-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 9, 2012 &
entered May 10, 2012).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

the

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2