Hector Morel v. U.S. Parole Commission

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998881422-2] Originating case number: 7:12-cv-00210-JLK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998938404]. Mailed to: Hector Morel. [12-7014]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7014 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/14/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7014 HECTOR MOREL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:12-cv-00210-JLK) Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 14, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hector Morel, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-7014 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/14/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Hector Morel appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Morel v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, No. 7:12-cv- 00210-JLK May (W.D. Va. 29, 2012) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?