Hector Morel v. U.S. Parole Commission
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998881422-2] Originating case number: 7:12-cv-00210-JLK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998938404]. Mailed to: Hector Morel. [12-7014]
Appeal: 12-7014
Doc: 9
Filed: 09/14/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7014
HECTOR MOREL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:12-cv-00210-JLK)
Submitted:
September 11, 2012
Decided:
September 14, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hector Morel, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7014
Doc: 9
Filed: 09/14/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Hector
Morel
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915A (2006).
We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous.
Accordingly, we deny leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by
the district court.
Morel v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, No. 7:12-cv-
00210-JLK
May
(W.D.
Va.
29,
2012)
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?