US v. Corey Thoma

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:94-cr-00109-FDW-2. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998950416]. Mailed to: Corey Thomas. [12-7031]

Appeal: 12-7031

Doc: 7

Filed: 10/02/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7031

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
COREY THOMAS,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:94-cr-00109-FDW-2)

Submitted:

September 27, 2012

Decided:

October 2, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant
United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Robert J.
Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7031

Doc: 7

Filed: 10/02/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Corey

Thomas

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence
reduction.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.
2

(W.D.N.C.

May

United States v. Thomas, No. 3:94-cr-00109-FDW31,

2012).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2