Helmar Olson v. Bobby Taylor
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00160-RJC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998938289]. Mailed to: Helmar Olson. [12-7056]
Appeal: 12-7056
Doc: 13
Filed: 09/14/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7056
HELMAR CHRISTOPHER OLSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOBBY
TAYLOR,
Correctional
Officer,
Mountain
View
Correctional Institution; MARL FOSTER, Correctional Officer,
Mountain
View
Correctional
Institution;
JAY
MOODY,
Correctional
Captain,
Mountain
View
Correctional
Institution; MIKE SLAGLE, Asst. Superintendent for Programs,
Mountain View Correctional Institution; MARGIE LAWLER, Asst.
Superintendent for Custody and Operations, Mountain View
Correctional
Institution;
SUSAN
WHITE,
Superintendent/
Mountain View Correctional Institution,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville.
Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:11-cv-00160-RJC)
Submitted:
September 11, 2012
Decided:
September 14, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Helmar Christopher Olson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7056
Doc: 13
Filed: 09/14/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Helmar Christopher Olson appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint,
denying
his
transfer
motion
venue.
reversible error.
to
We
have
May
24
and
reviewed
denying
the
record
his
motion
and
to
find
no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
(W.D.N.C.
reconsider,
&
Olson v. Taylor, No. 1:11-cv-00160-RJC
June
7,
2012).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?