Helmar Olson v. Bobby Taylor

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00160-RJC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998938289]. Mailed to: Helmar Olson. [12-7056]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7056 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/14/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7056 HELMAR CHRISTOPHER OLSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBY TAYLOR, Correctional Officer, Mountain View Correctional Institution; MARL FOSTER, Correctional Officer, Mountain View Correctional Institution; JAY MOODY, Correctional Captain, Mountain View Correctional Institution; MIKE SLAGLE, Asst. Superintendent for Programs, Mountain View Correctional Institution; MARGIE LAWLER, Asst. Superintendent for Custody and Operations, Mountain View Correctional Institution; SUSAN WHITE, Superintendent/ Mountain View Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:11-cv-00160-RJC) Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 14, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Helmar Christopher Olson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-7056 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/14/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Helmar Christopher Olson appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, denying his transfer motion venue. reversible error. to We have May 24 and reviewed denying the record his motion and to find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (W.D.N.C. reconsider, & Olson v. Taylor, No. 1:11-cv-00160-RJC June 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?