Patrick Andrews v. James Cro

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-cv-00113-FPS-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998999340]. Mailed to: Patrick Andrews. [12-7062]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7062 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/11/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7062 PATRICK FRANKLIN ANDREWS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JAMES N. CROSS, Warden; ROY C. CHEATHAM, Assistant Warden; THOMAS E. BERGAMI, Cpt.; ALBERT VERO, Lt.; ERIC GRIFFIN, Counselor; LEO REILLY, Officer; ERIC PHILLIPS, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00113-FPS-JES) Submitted: October 31, 2012 Decided: December 11, 2012 Before AGEE, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrick Franklin Andrews, Appellant Pro Se. Alan McGonigal, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-7062 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/11/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Patrick Franklin Andrews appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). error. district We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the court. Andrews v. (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 5, 2012). Cross, No. 5:10-cv-00113-FPS-JES We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?