Patrick Andrews v. James Cro
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-cv-00113-FPS-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998999340]. Mailed to: Patrick Andrews. [12-7062]
Appeal: 12-7062
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/11/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7062
PATRICK FRANKLIN ANDREWS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JAMES N. CROSS, Warden; ROY C. CHEATHAM, Assistant Warden;
THOMAS E. BERGAMI, Cpt.; ALBERT VERO, Lt.; ERIC GRIFFIN,
Counselor; LEO REILLY, Officer; ERIC PHILLIPS, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00113-FPS-JES)
Submitted:
October 31, 2012
Decided:
December 11, 2012
Before AGEE, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Franklin Andrews, Appellant Pro Se. Alan McGonigal,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7062
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/11/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Franklin Andrews appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
(1971).
error.
district
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
court.
Andrews
v.
(N.D. W. Va. Mar. 5, 2012).
Cross,
No.
5:10-cv-00113-FPS-JES
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?