Adam Pugh v. Ms. Evan

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998888761-2] Originating case number: 5:11-ct-03239-D. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998920712]. Mailed to: Adam Pugh. [12-7092]

Appeal: 12-7092

Doc: 11

Filed: 08/21/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7092

ADAM C. PUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MS. EVANS, Captain; JEFF WILLIAMS, Sergeant; MS. LINDA,
Nurse; OFFICER SULLIVAN; OFFICER HICKMAN; OFFICER BOHEMER;
OFFICER CAISON,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:11-ct-03239-D)

Submitted:

August 16, 2012

Decided:

August 21, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adam C. Pugh, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7092

Doc: 11

Filed: 08/21/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Adam

C.

Pugh

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Pugh v. Evans, No. 5:11-ct-03239-D (E.D.N.C. June 20,

2012).

We deny Pugh’s motion for appointment of counsel.

dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2