Juan Bermea-Cepeda v. Chaplain Chartier

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:11-cv-01231-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998975569]. Mailed to: Juan Bermea-Cepeda. [12-7108]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7108 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/06/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7108 JUAN BERMEA-CEPEDA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHAPLAIN CHARTIER, FCI Edgefield; ASSOCIATE CHAPLAIN MIMS, FCI Edgefield; DIRECTOR HOLT, Southeast Regional Director; ADMINISTRATOR HARRELL WATTS, Administrator National Inmate Appeals; WARDEN, FCI Edgefield, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (8:11-cv-01231-JMC) Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juan Bermea-Cepeda, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-7108 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/06/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Juan Bermea-Cepeda appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bermea-Cepeda v. Chartier, No. 8:11-cv-01231-JMC (D.S.C. June 21, 2012). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?