Juan Bermea-Cepeda v. Chaplain Chartier
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:11-cv-01231-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998975569]. Mailed to: Juan Bermea-Cepeda. [12-7108]
Appeal: 12-7108
Doc: 11
Filed: 11/06/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7108
JUAN BERMEA-CEPEDA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHAPLAIN CHARTIER, FCI Edgefield; ASSOCIATE CHAPLAIN MIMS,
FCI Edgefield; DIRECTOR HOLT, Southeast Regional Director;
ADMINISTRATOR HARRELL WATTS, Administrator National Inmate
Appeals; WARDEN, FCI Edgefield,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (8:11-cv-01231-JMC)
Submitted:
November 2, 2012
Decided:
November 6, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Juan Bermea-Cepeda, Appellant Pro Se.
Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7108
Doc: 11
Filed: 11/06/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Juan Bermea-Cepeda appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Bermea-Cepeda v. Chartier, No. 8:11-cv-01231-JMC (D.S.C.
June 21, 2012).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
the
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?