Ronald Mayfield, Jr. v. Kenneth Stolle

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00866-GBL-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998965379]. Mailed to: Mayfield. [12-7131]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7131 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/23/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7131 RONALD R. MAYFIELD, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. KENNETH STOLLE, Sheriff of Virginia Beach Jail; V. THOMAS, Captain of Virginia Beach City Jail, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00866-GBL-IDD) Submitted: October 5, 2012 Decided: October 23, 2012 Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald R. Mayfield, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-7131 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/23/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Ronald R. Mayfield, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to comply with a court order. We affirm. A plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order may warrant involuntary dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. review such a dismissal for abuse of discretion. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989). 41(b). We Ballard v. Our review of the record discloses no support for Mayfield’s contention on appeal that he filed a timely response, as we see no evidence that the district court received such a response, timely or otherwise. Accordingly, we find that the district court did not abuse its dispense discretion, with oral and affirm argument the because judgment the facts below. and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?