Adam Pugh v. John Ingram

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998987248-2] Originating case number: 5:12-ct-03027-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999005108]. Mailed to: Adam Pugh. [12-7174]

Appeal: 12-7174

Doc: 13

Filed: 12/18/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7174

ADAM CLAYTON PUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHERIFF JOHN INGRAM; CAPTAIN DAVIS; CAPTAIN EVANS,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:12-ct-03027-FL)

Submitted:

December 13, 2012

Decided:

December 18, 2012

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adam Clayton Pugh, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7174

Doc: 13

Filed: 12/18/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Adam Clayton Pugh appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. §

1983 (2006) complaint pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006).
and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.

Pugh v. Ingram, No. 5:12-

ct-03027-FL (E.D.N.C. July 3, 2012).

We deny Pugh’s motion for

appointment of counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2