Adam Pugh v. John Ingram
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998987248-2] Originating case number: 5:12-ct-03027-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Adam Pugh. [12-7174]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ADAM CLAYTON PUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
SHERIFF JOHN INGRAM; CAPTAIN DAVIS; CAPTAIN EVANS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:12-ct-03027-FL)
December 13, 2012
December 18, 2012
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adam Clayton Pugh, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Adam Clayton Pugh appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. §
1983 (2006) complaint pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006).
and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Pugh v. Ingram, No. 5:12-
ct-03027-FL (E.D.N.C. July 3, 2012).
We deny Pugh’s motion for
appointment of counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?