James Ward v. Kuma DeBoo
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00068-IMK-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998959984]. Mailed to: Ward. [12-7189]
Appeal: 12-7189
Doc: 13
Filed: 10/16/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7189
JAMES I. WARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN KUMA J. DEBOO; DR. RAMIREZ, Regional Clinical
Director; DR. ALLEN, Chief of Health Programs, Central
Office;
RENDI
THOMAS,
Designator,
Office
of
Medical
Designation and Transportation, Central Office; ELLEN MACELEIBSON, Former Health Service Clinical Director - FCI Gilmer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00068-IMK-JES)
Submitted:
October 11, 2012
Decided:
October 16, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James I. Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Jarod James Douglas, Assistant
United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7189
Doc: 13
Filed: 10/16/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James
I.
Ward
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Ward v. DeBoo, No. 1:11-cv-00068-IMK-JES (N.D.W. Va.
June 20, 2012).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
the
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?