US v. Spencer Bowen

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:98-cr-00110-REP-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998938375]. Mailed to: Spencer Bowens. [12-7195]

Appeal: 12-7195

Doc: 10

Filed: 09/14/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7195

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SPENCER BOWENS, a/k/a Scooter, a/k/a
McCurdy, a/k/a Doc Johnson,

Clyde,

a/k/a

Melvin

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:98-cr-00110-REP-1)

Submitted:

September 11, 2012

Decided:

September 14, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Spencer Bowens, Appellant Pro Se.
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Appellee.

Katherine Lee Martin,
Norfolk,
Virginia,
for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7195

Doc: 10

Filed: 09/14/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Spencer

Bowens

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006).

We have reviewed the record and

find that the district court correctly concluded that Bowens is
not

eligible

affirm.

for

a

and

materials

of

sentence.

Accordingly,

we

United States v. Bowens, No. 3:98-cr-00110-REP-1 (E.D.

Va. June 29, 2012).
facts

reduction

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

the

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2