US v. Tony B. Alexander
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:95-cr-00178-MOC-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998988829]. Mailed to: Tony B. Alexander. [12-7219]
Appeal: 12-7219
Doc: 8
Filed: 11/27/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7219
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TONY BERNARD ALEXANDER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:95-cr-00178-MOC-1)
Submitted:
November 20, 2012
Before TRAXLER,
Judges.
Chief
Judge,
Decided: November 27, 2012
and
SHEDD
and
FLOYD,
Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tony B. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se.
Kelli Hamby Ferry,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy
Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7219
Doc: 8
Filed: 11/27/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Tony B. Alexander appeals from the district court’s
order
granting
in
part
his
motion
for
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). *
record and find no reversible error.
reduction
of
sentence
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v.
Alexander, No. 3:95-cr-00178-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. June 8, 2012); see
United
States
v.
Dunphy,
551
F.3d
247,
257
(4th
Cir.
2009)
(holding that § 3582(c) proceeding is not a resentencing).
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
We
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Although the district court granted Alexander’s § 3582
motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce
Alexander’s sentence to the full extent he requested.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?