US v. Erwin Redding
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:09-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999018397]. Mailed to: Erwin Redding. [12-7250]
Appeal: 12-7250
Doc: 7
Filed: 01/09/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7250
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ERWIN BERNARD REDDING, a/k/a Easy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:09-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1)
Submitted:
December 19, 2012
Decided:
January 9, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Erwin Bernard Redding, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7250
Doc: 7
Filed: 01/09/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Erwin
orders denying
Bernard
his
motion
motion to reconsider.
reversible error.
by
the
Redding
the
district
reduction
for
appeals
of
court’s
sentence
and
his
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
district
court.
United
States
v.
Redding,
No.
3:09-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 26 & June 22, 2012).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?