US v. Erwin Redding

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:09-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999018397]. Mailed to: Erwin Redding. [12-7250]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7250 Doc: 7 Filed: 01/09/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7250 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ERWIN BERNARD REDDING, a/k/a Easy, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1) Submitted: December 19, 2012 Decided: January 9, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Erwin Bernard Redding, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-7250 Doc: 7 Filed: 01/09/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Erwin orders denying Bernard his motion motion to reconsider. reversible error. by the Redding the district reduction for appeals of court’s sentence and his We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated district court. United States v. Redding, No. 3:09-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 26 & June 22, 2012). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?