US v. Alejandro Hernandez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to dispense with appendix [998953831-2] Originating case number: 1:91-cr-00139-CMH-3 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998975461]. Mailed to: Alejandro Hernandez. [12-7264]--[Edited 11/06/2012 by BHR]
Appeal: 12-7264
Doc: 11
Filed: 11/06/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7264
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALEJANDRO DEJESUS HERNANDEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:91-cr-00139-CMH-3)
Submitted:
October 23, 2012
Decided:
November 6, 2012
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alejandro DeJesus Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se.
Bernard James
Apperson, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7264
Doc: 11
Filed: 11/06/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Alejandro
appeal.
DeJesus
Hernandez
has
filed
a
notice
of
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292
(2006);
Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546
(1949).
In
his
notice
of
appeal,
Hernandez
reference the order from which he is appealing.
does
not
A review of the
district court’s docket sheet does not show any final order from
which Hernandez could take an appeal.
the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
motion to dispense with the appendix.
Accordingly, we dismiss
We also deny as moot the
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?