US v. Alejandro Hernandez

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to dispense with appendix [998953831-2] Originating case number: 1:91-cr-00139-CMH-3 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998975461]. Mailed to: Alejandro Hernandez. [12-7264]--[Edited 11/06/2012 by BHR]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7264 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/06/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7264 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ALEJANDRO DEJESUS HERNANDEZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:91-cr-00139-CMH-3) Submitted: October 23, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012 Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alejandro DeJesus Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard James Apperson, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-7264 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/06/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Alejandro appeal. DeJesus Hernandez has filed a notice of This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). In his notice of appeal, Hernandez reference the order from which he is appealing. does not A review of the district court’s docket sheet does not show any final order from which Hernandez could take an appeal. the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. motion to dispense with the appendix. Accordingly, we dismiss We also deny as moot the We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?