Mauricio Weber v. G. Anderson, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:12-cv-01231-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998960104]. Mailed to: M. Weber. [12-7282]

Appeal: 12-7282

Doc: 9

Filed: 10/16/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7282

MAURICIO E. WEBER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
G. ROSS ANDERSON, JR., sued in official capacities; J.
CORDELL MADDOX, JR., Chief Administrative Judge; SOLICITOR
CHRISSY T. ADAMS; ASSISTANT SOLICITOR KRISTIN W. REEVES;
ASSISTANT SOLICITOR JENN BYFORD; CHRISTOPHER SCALZO, Public
Defender 10th Judicial Circuit,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(8:12-cv-01231-TMC)

Submitted:

October 11, 2012

Decided:

October 16, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mauricio E. Weber, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7282

Doc: 9

Filed: 10/16/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Mauricio E. Weber appeals the district court’s order
accepting

the

recommendation

of

the

magistrate

judge

and

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
that

this

appeal

is

We have reviewed the record and find

frivolous.

Accordingly,

we

dismiss

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Anderson,

No.

dispense

with

8:12-cv-01231-TMC
oral

argument

(D.S.C.
because

July
the

the

Weber v.

6,

2012).

facts

and

We
legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2