Roger Terry, Jr. v. M. Middleton

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-01686-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999001399]. Mailed to: Roger Terry, Jr.. [12-7329]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7329 Doc: 19 Filed: 12/13/2012 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7329 ROGER DALE TERRY, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. M. MIDDLETON, Ofc, COS; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; SLATE STATE, Sgt, Rep; P. SHIELDS, D.O.C., Co2; FRED NASTRI, H.O., Defendants – Appellees, and DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; SCOTT OAKLEY, Executive Director of the IGO; J. L. TRUE, Captain; LENORA C. ADEGBESON, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01686-ELH) Submitted: November 29, 2012 Decided: December 13, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 12-7329 Doc: 19 Filed: 12/13/2012 Pg: 2 of 3 Roger Dale Terry, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Nancy P. Tennis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 12-7329 Doc: 19 Filed: 12/13/2012 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Roger Dale Terry, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Terry June 29, 2012). facts and materials legal before v. Middleton, We dispense No. with 1:11-cv-01686-ELH oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court (D. Md. because the presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?