Steven Barnes v. Judge Keesley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:11-cv-02969-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998982766]. Mailed to: Barnes. [12-7460]

Appeal: 12-7460

Doc: 11

Filed: 11/16/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7460

STEVEN LOUIS BARNES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JUDGE WILLIAM KEESLEY; STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL ALAN WILSON;
ATTORNEY DANIEL PLYLER; ATTORNEY GREGORY; STATE OFFICIALS,
only in their official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Margaret B. Seymour, Chief
District Judge. (4:11-cv-02969-MBS)

Submitted:

November 13, 2012

Decided: November 16, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Louis Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7460

Doc: 11

Filed: 11/16/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Steven

Louis

Barnes

appeals

the

district

court’s

orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without
prejudice and denying reconsideration. *
record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.

Barnes v. Keesley,

4:11-cv-02969-MBS (D.S.C. June 27 & July 25, 2012).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

the

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Although the magistrate judge issued a report and
recommendation that the complaint be dismissed, the district
court relied on different reasoning in dismissing the complaint.

2