US v. Wayne Joyner

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for abeyance (Local Rule 12(d)) [998964932-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998956604-3] Originating case number: 1:92-cr-00083-AVB-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999026114].. [12-7525]

Appeal: 12-7525

Doc: 15

Filed: 01/22/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7525

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
WAYNE EDWARD JOYNER,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:92-cr-00083-AVB-2)

Submitted:

January 17, 2013

Decided:

January 22, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Edward Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7525

Doc: 15

Filed: 01/22/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Wayne Edward Joyner appeals the district court’s order
denying
(2006)

his

Fed.

motions.

reversible error.
by

the

district

1:92-cr-00083-AVB-2

R.

Crim.

We

have

P.

36

and

reviewed

18

the

U.S.C.
record

§ 3582(c)(2)
and

find

no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
court.
(E.D.

United
Va.

Aug.

States
8,

v.

2012).

Joyner,
We

also

No.
deny

Joyner’s motions to appoint counsel and to place the appeal in
abeyance.
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2