US v. Bryant Reed

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998945935-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998936347-2] Originating case number: 5:08-cr-00276-BO-1,5:12-cv-00172-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999027373]. Mailed to: Bryant Reed. [12-7535]

Appeal: 12-7535

Doc: 16

Filed: 01/23/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7535

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
BRYANT WILLIAM REED,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:08-cr-00276-BO-1; 5:12-cv-00172-BO)

Submitted:

December 13, 2012

Decided:

January 23, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryant William Reed, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7535

Doc: 16

Filed: 01/23/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Bryant
court’s

order

William

dismissing

(West Supp. 2012) motion.
no reversible error.
stated

by

the

Reed
as

seeks

untimely

to

appeal

his

28

the

district

U.S.C.A.

§

2255

We have reviewed the record and find

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

district

court.

United

States

v.

Reed,

Nos.

5:08-cr-00276-BO-1; 5:12-cv-00172-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 2012).
We deny Reed’s motions for appointment of counsel.

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2