Steve Sabo v. Robert Stevenson, III
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:11-cv-02681-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999043998]. Mailed to: appellant. [12-7550]
Appeal: 12-7550
Doc: 9
Filed: 02/14/2013
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7550
STEVEN A. SABO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden of Broad River Correctional
Institution,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (8:11-cv-02681-JMC)
Submitted:
January 23, 2013
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
DAVIS,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
and
February 14, 2013
HAMILTON,
Senior
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven A. Sabo, Appellant Pro Se.
Donald John Zelenka, Senior
Assistant
Attorney
General,
Melody
Jane
Brown,
Assistant
Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7550
Doc: 9
Filed: 02/14/2013
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Steven A. Sabo seeks to appeal the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition.
The
order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues
a
certificate
(2006).
of
appealability.
28
U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1)(A)
A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006).
relief
on
the
demonstrating
district
merits,
that
court’s
debatable
or
a
prisoner
reasonable
assessment
wrong.
When the district court denies
satisfies
jurists
would
of
the
v.
McDaniel,
Slack
this
standard
find
constitutional
529
U.S.
by
that
the
claims
is
473,
484
(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003).
When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the
prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural
ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable
claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
Slack, 529 U.S.
at 484-85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude
that Sabo has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
2
the
facts
and
We
legal
Appeal: 12-7550
Doc: 9
contentions
Filed: 02/14/2013
are
adequately
Pg: 3 of 3
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?