US v. Zaman Ashraf

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:03-cr-00458-REP-3. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999164843]. Mailed to: Z. Ashraf. [12-7560]

Appeal: 12-7560

Doc: 6

Filed: 08/02/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7560

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ZAMAN ASHRAF, a/k/a Pop,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:03-cr-00458-REP-3)

Submitted:

July 22, 2013

Decided:

August 2, 2013

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zaman Ashraf, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7560

Doc: 6

Filed: 08/02/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Zaman
denying

his

Ashraf

motion

for

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006).
reversible error.
by

the

district

appeals

the

reduction

district
of

court’s

sentence,

18

order
U.S.C.

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
court.

United

States

v.

Ashraf,

No.

3:03-cr-00458-REP-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2012).

We dispense with

oral

legal

contentions

are

before

this

and

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

court

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2