US v. Zaman Ashraf

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:03-cr-00458-REP-3. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999164843]. Mailed to: Z. Ashraf. [12-7560]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7560 Doc: 6 Filed: 08/02/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7560 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ZAMAN ASHRAF, a/k/a Pop, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00458-REP-3) Submitted: July 22, 2013 Decided: August 2, 2013 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Zaman Ashraf, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-7560 Doc: 6 Filed: 08/02/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Zaman denying his Ashraf motion for § 3582(c)(2) (2006). reversible error. by the district appeals the reduction district of court’s sentence, 18 order U.S.C. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated court. United States v. Ashraf, No. 3:03-cr-00458-REP-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2012). We dispense with oral legal contentions are before this and argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials court argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?