Habeeb Malik v. James Sligh, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-cv-01064-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999028590]. Mailed to: appellant. [12-7576]

Appeal: 12-7576

Doc: 19

Filed: 01/24/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7576

HABEEB ABDUL MALIK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES E. SLIGH, JR.; JANNITA GASTON; BERNARD MCKIE; JON E.
OZMINT; BILL BYARS; VAUGHN JACKSON; ROBERT E. WARD; TRAVIS
REESE, All sued in their individual and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.
R. Bryan Harwell, District
Judge. (5:11-cv-01064-RBH)

Submitted:

January 22, 2013

Decided: January 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Habeeb Abdul Malik, Appellant Pro Se.
Andrew Lindemann,
DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7576

Doc: 19

Filed: 01/24/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Habeeb Abdul Malik appeals the district court’s order
accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

See

Sept. 4,

2012).

facts

and

materials

Malik

legal
before

v.

We

Sligh,

dispense

No.
with

5:11-cv-01064-RBH
oral

argument

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

because

presented

would

(D.S.C.

not

the

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2