US v. James Thomas Wallace

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998951043-2] Originating case number: 4:03-cr-00918-TLW-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999010754]. Mailed to: James Thomas Wallace. [12-7588]

Appeal: 12-7588

Doc: 9

Filed: 12/27/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7588

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES THOMAS WALLACE,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:03-cr-00918-TLW-1)

Submitted:

December 20, 2012

Decided:

December 27, 2012

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Thomas Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7588

Doc: 9

Filed: 12/27/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
James

Thomas

Wallace

appeals

the

district

court’s

order denying his motion to modify sentence under 18 U.S.C. §
3582(c)(1)(B) (2006).
reversible error.
appointment
court.

of

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we deny Wallace’s motion for

counsel

United

and

States

(D.S.C. July 24, 2012).

v.

affirm

the

Wallace,

order
No.

of

the

district

4:03-cr-00918-TLW-1

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2