US v. Mark Howell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:08-cr-00041-BO-1,4:11-cv-00185-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999079825].. [12-7670]

Appeal: 12-7670

Doc: 33

Filed: 04/04/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7670

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARK ALLEN HOWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (4:08-cr-00041-BO-1; 4:11-cv-00185-BO)

Submitted:

March 25, 2013

Decided:

April 4, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul K. Sun, Jr., ELLIS & WINTERS, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellant.
Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney,
Jennifer P. May-Parker, Yvonne V. Watford-McKinney, Assistant
United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7670

Doc: 33

Filed: 04/04/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Mark Allen Howell appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion as
untimely.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

United

States

v.

Howell,

No.

4:08-cr-00041-BO-1

See

(E.D.N.C.

Sept. 4, 2012); cf. Lo v. Endicott, 506 F.3d 572, 575 (7th Cir.
2007); E.J.R.E. v. United States, 453 F.3d 1094, 1098 (8th Cir.
2006); Shannon v. Newland, 410 F.3d 1083, 1089 (9th Cir. 2005).
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2