Douglas Seibert v. Nannie Mohead

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998955119-2] Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00399-RAJ-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999010662]. Mailed to: Seibert. [12-7726]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7726 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/27/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7726 DOUGLAS B. SEIBERT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NANNIE MOHEAD, S2 VCE Woodshop Manager; FRANK ROACH, Unit Manager/Building Supervisor; JESSE ARRINGTON, Correctional Officer; MILTON REED, VCE General Manager; DOUG CHAPMAN, S2 VCE Woodshop Manager; BELTON WILLIAMS, VCE Industrial Group Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00399-RAJ-TEM) Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 27, 2012 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas B. Seibert, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-7726 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/27/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Douglas B. Seibert appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, appoint error. counsel, and affirm for we deny the Seibert’s reasons motion stated by to the district court. Seibert v. Mohead, No. 2:12-cv-00399-RAJ-TEM (E.D. 4, Va. Sept. 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?