Douglas Seibert v. Nannie Mohead
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998955119-2] Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00399-RAJ-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999010662]. Mailed to: Seibert. [12-7726]
Appeal: 12-7726
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/27/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7726
DOUGLAS B. SEIBERT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NANNIE MOHEAD, S2 VCE Woodshop Manager; FRANK ROACH, Unit
Manager/Building Supervisor; JESSE ARRINGTON, Correctional
Officer; MILTON REED, VCE General Manager; DOUG CHAPMAN, S2
VCE Woodshop Manager; BELTON WILLIAMS, VCE Industrial Group
Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News.
Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (2:12-cv-00399-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted:
December 20, 2012
Decided:
December 27, 2012
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas B. Seibert, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7726
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/27/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas B. Seibert appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2006).
We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible
Accordingly,
appoint
error.
counsel,
and
affirm
for
we
deny
the
Seibert’s
reasons
motion
stated
by
to
the
district court.
Seibert v. Mohead, No. 2:12-cv-00399-RAJ-TEM
(E.D.
4,
Va.
Sept.
2012).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?