Tony Belton v. Willie Bamberg

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998992857-2] Originating case number: 1:11-cv-02301-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999030016]. Mailed to: Belton. [12-7732]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7732 Doc: 19 Filed: 01/25/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7732 TONY LEE BELTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIE BAMBERG; WANDA STEWART; ROBERT HOOPER, Defendants – Appellees, and ORANGEBURG CALHOUN REGIONAL DETENTION CENTER, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief District Judge. (1:11-cv-02301-MBS) Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 25, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tony Lee Belton, Appellant Pro Se. Norma Anne Turner Jett, NESS & JETT, LLC, Bamberg, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-7732 Doc: 19 Filed: 01/25/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Tony adopting Lee the Belton magistrate appeals the judge’s district court’s recommendation to order grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil rights action alleging violations of his constitutional rights while incarcerated at the Orangeburg-Calhoun Regional Detention Center. Belton has also moved for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, and Belton’s find motion no for reversible error. appointment district court’s amended judgment. of counsel and we affirm deny the Belton v. Bamberg, No. 1:11- cv-02301-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?