Tony Belton v. Willie Bamberg
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998992857-2] Originating case number: 1:11-cv-02301-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999030016]. Mailed to: Belton. [12-7732]
Appeal: 12-7732
Doc: 19
Filed: 01/25/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7732
TONY LEE BELTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIE BAMBERG; WANDA STEWART; ROBERT HOOPER,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
ORANGEBURG CALHOUN REGIONAL DETENTION CENTER,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
Margaret B. Seymour, Chief District
Judge. (1:11-cv-02301-MBS)
Submitted:
January 22, 2013
Decided: January 25, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tony Lee Belton, Appellant Pro Se. Norma Anne Turner Jett, NESS
& JETT, LLC, Bamberg, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7732
Doc: 19
Filed: 01/25/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Tony
adopting
Lee
the
Belton
magistrate
appeals
the
judge’s
district
court’s
recommendation
to
order
grant
Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil rights action alleging
violations of his constitutional rights while incarcerated at
the Orangeburg-Calhoun Regional Detention Center.
Belton has
also moved for appointment of counsel.
We have reviewed the
record
Accordingly,
and
Belton’s
find
motion
no
for
reversible
error.
appointment
district court’s amended judgment.
of
counsel
and
we
affirm
deny
the
Belton v. Bamberg, No. 1:11-
cv-02301-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2012).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?