US v. Michael Alexander

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:04-cr-00039-FDW-DCK-4. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999050286]. Mailed to: Michael Alexander. [12-7756]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7756 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/25/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7756 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MICHAEL SHAWN ALEXANDER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00039-FDW-DCK-4) Submitted: February 21, 2013 Before AGEE and Circuit Judge. DAVIS, Circuit Decided: February 25, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Shawn Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Christopher Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-7756 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/25/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Shawn Alexander appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 sentence reduction. U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by court. the district United States v. Alexander, 3:04-cr-00039-FDW-DCK-4 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 2012). No. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?