US v. Michael Alexander
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:04-cr-00039-FDW-DCK-4. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999050286]. Mailed to: Michael Alexander. [12-7756]
Appeal: 12-7756
Doc: 7
Filed: 02/25/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7756
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL SHAWN ALEXANDER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:04-cr-00039-FDW-DCK-4)
Submitted:
February 21, 2013
Before AGEE and
Circuit Judge.
DAVIS,
Circuit
Decided: February 25, 2013
Judges,
and
HAMILTON,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Shawn Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Christopher
Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North
Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney,
Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7756
Doc: 7
Filed: 02/25/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Shawn Alexander appeals the district court’s
order
denying
his
18
sentence reduction.
U.S.C.
§
3582(c)(2)
(2006)
motion
for
We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by
court.
the
district
United
States
v.
Alexander,
3:04-cr-00039-FDW-DCK-4 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 2012).
No.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?